Southern

Furman

17-16NET#168Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #122Coach: Bob Richey

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,098	973	4.6—	111.5—	106.9—	52.1%—	31.9%—	16.6%—	31.3%—	52.2%—	71.4%—	16.9%—	27.8%—
PeguesJ. PeguesVander WalB. Vander WalHienG. HienSmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.FosterM. Foster	166	84	22.8—	118.9—	96.2—	56.1%—	31.5%—	16.8%—	27.9%—	47.5%—	72.7%—	20.1%—	29.3%—
PeguesJ. PeguesHienG. HienHugheyT. HugheySmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.WilliamsA. Williams	110	55	28.2—	128.0—	99.8—	63.0%—	40.0%—	20.0%—	12.5%—	56.2%—	87.0%—	20.7%—	12.4%—
PeguesJ. PeguesHugheyT. HugheyWhittC. WhittFosterM. FosterWilliamsA. Williams	86	42	-20.9—	85.0—	105.9—	45.9%—	17.0%—	19.8%—	8.1%—	52.4%—	79.5%—	12.4%—	12.2%—
PeguesJ. PeguesHienG. HienSmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.WhittC. WhittWilliamsA. Williams	80	32	-19.5—	90.1—	109.6—	48.2%—	11.4%—	20.0%—	44.6%—	48.5%—	61.5%—	15.3%—	25.0%—
PeguesJ. PeguesHienG. HienSmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.FosterM. FosterWilliamsA. Williams	71	34	41.2—	113.2—	72.0—	55.4%—	21.4%—	11.3%—	21.5%—	32.8%—	75.0%—	16.2%—	31.1%—
PeguesJ. PeguesHienG. HienHugheyT. HugheySmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.FosterM. Foster	69	37	24.4—	105.6—	81.2—	50.8%—	28.6%—	15.9%—	23.8%—	35.8%—	69.4%—	14.8%—	17.9%—
PeguesJ. PeguesVander WalB. Vander WalHienG. HienSmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.WilliamsA. Williams	53	26	-18.5—	110.2—	128.6—	45.2%—	37.5%—	11.4%—	26.9%—	58.2%—	70.4%—	8.9%—	42.9%—
BowserC. BowserVander WalB. Vander WalMolnarD. MolnarSmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.WhittC. Whitt	50	23	-15.3—	96.0—	111.3—	37.5%—	35.5%—	14.0%—	47.7%—	57.4%—	68.0%—	21.9%—	17.0%—
PeguesJ. PeguesVander WalB. Vander WalHugheyT. HugheyWhittC. WhittWilliamsA. Williams	48	23	19.5—	124.4—	104.9—	54.2%—	40.7%—	12.4%—	22.9%—	52.5%—	69.6%—	17.1%—	30.0%—
PeguesJ. PeguesHugheyT. HugheySmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.FosterM. FosterWilliamsA. Williams	47	20	38.1—	128.6—	90.4—	67.6%—	21.1%—	14.8%—	64.7%—	42.4%—	61.5%—	23.8%—	57.6%—
PeguesJ. PeguesHienG. HienWhittC. WhittFosterM. FosterWilliamsA. Williams	46	22	-13.1—	110.2—	123.3—	57.1%—	20.8%—	10.8%—	21.4%—	55.8%—	56.5%—	16.0%—	18.6%—
PeguesJ. PeguesBowserC. BowserVander WalB. Vander WalSmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.FosterM. Foster	41	19	14.3—	123.2—	108.9—	48.7%—	52.0%—	19.7%—	42.1%—	54.5%—	84.2%—	8.6%—	12.1%—
PeguesJ. PeguesVander WalB. Vander WalHienG. HienWhittC. WhittFosterM. Foster	39	17	2.0—	102.6—	100.6—	55.6%—	27.8%—	20.5%—	0.0%—	51.4%—	78.3%—	14.4%—	27.8%—
PeguesJ. PeguesBowserC. BowserSmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.FosterM. FosterWilliamsA. Williams	36	17	-34.9—	102.3—	137.2—	44.4%—	17.6%—	16.6%—	48.1%—	63.2%—	60.0%—	10.6%—	10.5%—
PeguesJ. PeguesHienG. HienSmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.WhittC. WhittFosterM. Foster	36	16	4.4—	142.7—	138.2—	67.7%—	25.0%—	11.2%—	32.3%—	64.1%—	61.1%—	12.0%—	28.1%—
PeguesJ. PeguesBowserC. BowserHugheyT. HugheySmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.FosterM. Foster	36	18	47.1—	139.9—	92.8—	67.2%—	38.9%—	16.8%—	31.3%—	45.3%—	83.3%—	15.5%—	25.0%—
Vander WalB. Vander WalHienG. HienSmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.WhittC. WhittFosterM. Foster	35	16	-9.1—	110.4—	119.6—	59.7%—	41.2%—	22.7%—	22.6%—	59.1%—	76.5%—	10.9%—	24.2%—
BowserC. BowserVander WalB. Vander WalSmith Jr.P. Smith Jr.WhittC. WhittFosterM. Foster	35	14	27.5—	132.7—	105.2—	60.7%—	35.7%—	14.4%—	50.0%—	48.1%—	81.3%—	15.0%—	33.3%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2023-24. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.