WCC

Gonzaga

31-4NET#9Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #8Coach: Mark Few

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,408	1,132	26.3—	120.0—	93.8—	55.8%—	34.7%—	13.7%—	31.1%—	46.5%—	74.3%—	20.0%—	31.2%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterFogleD. FogleSaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	146	75	39.9—	125.2—	85.3—	51.1%—	36.1%—	8.2%—	38.1%—	41.1%—	72.7%—	19.4%—	27.4%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiMillerA. MillerWarleyJ. WarleySaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	127	68	-0.6—	97.8—	98.4—	46.9%—	34.8%—	19.7%—	23.9%—	46.8%—	69.2%—	21.0%—	31.2%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiSmithB. SmithMillerA. MillerWarleyJ. Warley	124	69	27.6—	123.0—	95.4—	54.8%—	30.2%—	6.5%—	14.3%—	51.1%—	78.6%—	21.7%—	32.6%—
IkeG. IkeHuffB. HuffGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterMillerA. MillerSaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	93	44	21.2—	119.3—	98.1—	52.1%—	42.6%—	12.9%—	20.0%—	59.6%—	79.4%—	26.5%—	17.6%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiHuffB. HuffVentersS. VentersSaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	82	41	38.8—	123.8—	85.0—	53.7%—	41.9%—	12.3%—	22.2%—	40.2%—	73.8%—	20.9%—	36.1%—
IkeG. IkeVentersS. VentersGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterWarleyJ. WarleySaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	73	33	15.2—	115.8—	100.5—	59.5%—	28.6%—	19.3%—	31.0%—	53.3%—	77.8%—	20.1%—	26.7%—
IkeG. IkeGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterMillerA. MillerWarleyJ. WarleySaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	69	31	39.3—	102.4—	63.1—	45.9%—	32.4%—	11.5%—	42.6%—	29.8%—	77.8%—	21.0%—	14.5%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiHuffB. HuffVentersS. VentersSmithB. Smith	66	35	31.8—	143.1—	111.3—	74.6%—	25.0%—	12.1%—	8.2%—	50.0%—	73.0%—	12.2%—	26.7%—
IkeG. IkeHuffB. HuffSmithB. SmithGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterMillerA. Miller	65	31	39.7—	133.1—	93.4—	68.2%—	29.2%—	13.9%—	29.1%—	49.0%—	71.0%—	22.2%—	25.0%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiHuffB. HuffSmithB. SmithMillerA. Miller	61	31	5.6—	99.4—	93.8—	47.5%—	28.1%—	13.0%—	8.3%—	45.0%—	81.8%—	16.8%—	24.0%—
InnocentiE. InnocentiHuffB. HuffVentersS. VentersSmithB. SmithWarleyJ. Warley	59	27	26.2—	111.5—	85.4—	60.0%—	33.3%—	20.3%—	26.0%—	43.8%—	82.4%—	17.1%—	50.0%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterMillerA. MillerSaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	59	29	-19.0—	103.2—	122.2—	48.1%—	27.3%—	11.8%—	27.8%—	54.2%—	64.7%—	13.4%—	16.9%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiSmithB. SmithGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterFogleD. Fogle	45	21	7.9—	109.6—	101.7—	64.5%—	23.5%—	26.8%—	38.7%—	48.7%—	60.9%—	21.3%—	23.7%—
DiagneI. DiagneVentersS. VentersGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterFogleD. FogleSaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	42	17	58.0—	123.3—	65.3—	56.6%—	64.7%—	21.3%—	34.2%—	33.3%—	75.0%—	31.3%—	33.3%—
IkeG. IkeSmithB. SmithGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterMillerA. MillerWarleyJ. Warley	42	21	51.9—	151.3—	99.4—	66.3%—	47.4%—	9.6%—	35.0%—	48.7%—	72.0%—	19.9%—	23.1%—
IkeG. IkeGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterWarleyJ. WarleyFogleD. FogleSaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	41	17	45.9—	126.9—	81.0—	60.9%—	28.6%—	12.2%—	65.6%—	37.5%—	83.3%—	15.7%—	28.1%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiHuffB. HuffMillerA. MillerSaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	41	16	45.7—	149.1—	103.3—	82.1%—	33.3%—	12.2%—	82.1%—	53.4%—	82.4%—	18.1%—	41.4%—
HuffB. HuffSmithB. SmithGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterMillerA. MillerWarleyJ. Warley	40	17	41.7—	118.1—	76.4—	62.1%—	25.0%—	17.6%—	24.2%—	37.2%—	70.4%—	21.5%—	10.3%—
InnocentiE. InnocentiDiagneI. DiagneSmithB. SmithMillerA. MillerWarleyJ. Warley	39	24	16.7—	73.6—	56.9—	37.8%—	24.0%—	17.8%—	8.1%—	34.5%—	90.9%—	21.7%—	13.8%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiMillerA. MillerFogleD. FogleSaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	38	17	63.8—	146.1—	82.3—	69.4%—	42.9%—	13.0%—	19.4%—	40.4%—	94.1%—	9.9%—	19.2%—
HuffB. HuffGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterMillerA. MillerWarleyJ. WarleySaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	37	16	40.3—	138.8—	98.5—	55.1%—	38.1%—	2.7%—	25.6%—	55.2%—	87.5%—	15.4%—	3.4%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiWarleyJ. WarleyFogleD. FogleSaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	35	18	29.7—	130.6—	100.9—	57.6%—	52.9%—	17.0%—	33.3%—	46.8%—	77.8%—	15.1%—	45.2%—
VentersS. VentersGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterWarleyJ. WarleyFogleD. FogleSaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	34	13	34.7—	146.1—	111.4—	62.9%—	42.9%—	11.7%—	35.5%—	58.0%—	61.5%—	27.8%—	28.0%—
InnocentiE. InnocentiHuffB. HuffVentersS. VentersWarleyJ. WarleySaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	33	15	89.1—	142.6—	53.5—	72.6%—	27.3%—	12.1%—	6.5%—	33.3%—	75.0%—	36.8%—	19.0%—
IkeG. IkeVentersS. VentersGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterFogleD. FogleSaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	32	14	14.8—	128.7—	113.9—	65.5%—	43.8%—	22.0%—	20.7%—	60.0%—	66.7%—	20.1%—	24.0%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiVentersS. VentersSmithB. SmithWarleyJ. Warley	32	16	15.2—	144.9—	129.7—	72.0%—	18.2%—	12.6%—	40.0%—	60.9%—	55.6%—	19.3%—	34.4%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiVentersS. VentersWarleyJ. WarleySaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	31	14	11.0—	114.9—	104.0—	50.0%—	35.3%—	16.0%—	24.1%—	52.1%—	92.9%—	12.2%—	50.0%—
IkeG. IkeInnocentiE. InnocentiGrant-FosterT. Grant-FosterWarleyJ. WarleySaint-SuperyM. Saint-Supery	30	15	-8.0—	95.5—	103.4—	48.1%—	20.0%—	16.5%—	19.2%—	53.7%—	64.3%—	26.5%—	44.4%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.