MAC

Miami OH

32-2NET#65Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #197Coach: Travis Steele

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,295	1,058	17.6—	122.8—	105.2—	60.0%—	26.3%—	14.1%—	38.7%—	50.8%—	71.9%—	17.0%—	28.6%—
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersSkaljacL. Skaljac	481	240	17.6—	124.9—	107.3—	62.6%—	23.1%—	13.1%—	33.8%—	52.9%—	69.5%—	18.5%—	23.8%—
ElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersSkaljacL. SkaljacAtlasonA. Atlason	155	65	14.8—	127.4—	112.6—	58.7%—	29.2%—	11.6%—	60.3%—	52.4%—	70.9%—	13.7%—	43.9%—
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersIpsaroE. Ipsaro	123	66	36.4—	127.4—	90.9—	63.8%—	26.5%—	13.8%—	28.6%—	43.2%—	74.6%—	16.8%—	23.6%—
ElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersAtlasonA. AtlasonPerryT. Perry	67	33	-0.6—	117.8—	118.4—	55.2%—	27.3%—	14.9%—	29.3%—	48.0%—	55.3%—	13.5%—	13.5%—
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerByersB. ByersIpsaroE. IpsaroSkaljacL. Skaljac	61	24	33.4—	103.5—	70.1—	53.8%—	8.7%—	18.1%—	69.2%—	39.0%—	82.8%—	24.0%—	9.8%—
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersPerryT. Perry	60	26	5.8—	117.5—	111.7—	55.3%—	23.1%—	14.9%—	46.8%—	51.0%—	67.9%—	12.8%—	32.7%—
SuderP. SuderByersB. ByersAtlasonA. AtlasonKirbyJ. KirbyPerryT. Perry	60	27	-15.9—	104.4—	120.3—	51.9%—	20.6%—	16.6%—	13.0%—	60.7%—	76.7%—	12.0%—	35.7%—
ElmerE. ElmerByersB. ByersSkaljacL. SkaljacAtlasonA. AtlasonKirbyJ. Kirby	54	21	4.6—	113.1—	108.5—	59.5%—	0.0%—	11.1%—	62.2%—	45.7%—	64.5%—	13.1%—	46.8%—
ElmerE. ElmerByersB. ByersAtlasonA. AtlasonKirbyJ. KirbyPerryT. Perry	52	20	-11.3—	115.3—	126.6—	60.3%—	30.0%—	19.2%—	48.7%—	60.2%—	83.3%—	5.8%—	14.3%—
SuderP. SuderByersB. ByersSkaljacL. SkaljacAtlasonA. AtlasonKirbyJ. Kirby	48	23	10.2—	115.5—	105.3—	60.5%—	14.3%—	10.5%—	42.1%—	51.1%—	69.2%—	19.9%—	15.6%—
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersKirbyJ. Kirby	44	22	24.1—	134.8—	110.7—	51.4%—	33.3%—	4.6%—	80.6%—	60.0%—	70.6%—	22.6%—	25.7%—
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersSkaljacL. SkaljacKirbyJ. Kirby	43	21	38.2—	152.8—	114.7—	73.0%—	35.7%—	11.6%—	35.1%—	63.2%—	77.8%—	23.8%—	32.4%—
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerByersB. ByersSkaljacL. SkaljacKirbyJ. Kirby	39	17	44.5—	132.1—	87.6—	64.1%—	37.5%—	13.0%—	50.0%—	46.3%—	66.7%—	26.6%—	51.9%—
SuderP. SuderByersB. ByersIpsaroE. IpsaroSkaljacL. SkaljacAtlasonA. Atlason	35	15	21.7—	135.4—	113.7—	75.0%—	18.2%—	14.4%—	46.2%—	53.3%—	77.8%—	8.5%—	43.3%—
WoolfolkA. WoolfolkElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderSkaljacL. SkaljacKirbyJ. Kirby	35	18	30.4—	138.6—	108.2—	67.9%—	35.7%—	14.4%—	50.0%—	47.4%—	76.0%—	7.5%—	26.3%—
ElmerE. ElmerSuderP. SuderByersB. ByersAtlasonA. AtlasonKirbyJ. Kirby	32	16	28.5—	126.2—	97.7—	57.4%—	33.3%—	15.8%—	44.4%—	40.0%—	65.0%—	15.3%—	33.3%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.