Big 10

USC

18-14NET#89Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #71Coach: Eric Musselman

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,196	1,005	0.1—	108.0—	107.8—	50.5%—	32.7%—	16.8%—	43.4%—	49.6%—	68.1%—	16.4%—	33.4%—
WoodsK. WoodsAusarE. AusarCofieJ. CofieBaker-MazaraC. Baker-MazaraArenasA. Arenas	105	54	14.3—	114.5—	100.2—	56.1%—	38.8%—	19.1%—	32.2%—	47.5%—	78.9%—	9.8%—	10.1%—
MarshJ. MarshWoodsK. WoodsAusarE. AusarCofieJ. CofieArenasA. Arenas	82	39	-24.5—	113.5—	138.0—	53.4%—	42.1%—	17.1%—	31.5%—	63.7%—	61.1%—	12.9%—	24.7%—
WoodsK. WoodsAusarE. AusarCofieJ. CofieBaker-MazaraC. Baker-MazaraEaster IIJ. Easter II	61	31	3.4—	109.4—	105.9—	46.7%—	33.3%—	16.3%—	65.2%—	44.4%—	60.5%—	14.9%—	30.2%—
WoodsK. WoodsAusarE. AusarCofieJ. CofieArenasA. ArenasEaster IIJ. Easter II	45	25	29.3—	129.7—	100.4—	62.8%—	38.9%—	15.7%—	30.8%—	46.5%—	69.6%—	15.0%—	18.6%—
WoodsK. WoodsAusarE. AusarCofieJ. CofieDynesG. DynesBaker-MazaraC. Baker-Mazara	44	24	14.4—	107.7—	93.3—	47.4%—	40.0%—	16.0%—	36.8%—	47.1%—	79.2%—	14.7%—	28.6%—
WoodsK. WoodsAusarE. AusarWilliams IIT. Williams IICofieJ. CofieArenasA. Arenas	43	24	-21.8—	100.7—	122.5—	45.8%—	26.3%—	14.1%—	33.3%—	53.7%—	61.9%—	13.9%—	22.0%—
RiceR. RiceAusarE. AusarWilliams IIT. Williams IICofieJ. CofieBaker-MazaraC. Baker-Mazara	41	22	29.3—	114.3—	84.9—	51.4%—	33.3%—	9.7%—	40.5%—	44.4%—	68.2%—	25.9%—	13.9%—
AusarE. AusarWilliams IIT. Williams IICofieJ. CofieBaker-MazaraC. Baker-MazaraEaster IIJ. Easter II	41	23	-0.9—	105.5—	106.4—	50.0%—	40.9%—	22.1%—	27.8%—	50.0%—	61.1%—	22.2%—	42.9%—
WoodsK. WoodsAusarE. AusarCofieJ. CofieDynesG. DynesArenasA. Arenas	40	17	10.1—	92.2—	82.1—	44.8%—	16.7%—	17.4%—	51.7%—	42.9%—	77.8%—	23.8%—	35.7%—
CornishR. CornishWoodsK. WoodsAusarE. AusarCofieJ. CofieArenasA. Arenas	39	20	27.1—	104.8—	77.7—	51.6%—	33.3%—	17.9%—	46.9%—	37.8%—	64.0%—	25.1%—	10.8%—
BrownellJ. BrownellAusarE. AusarCofieJ. CofieBaker-MazaraC. Baker-MazaraEaster IIJ. Easter II	34	16	28.3—	113.9—	85.6—	55.2%—	25.0%—	11.7%—	37.9%—	29.7%—	73.1%—	6.1%—	37.5%—
MarshJ. MarshAusarE. AusarWilliams IIT. Williams IICofieJ. CofieBaker-MazaraC. Baker-Mazara	34	12	44.6—	122.2—	77.6—	59.1%—	20.0%—	14.9%—	81.8%—	42.9%—	85.7%—	24.8%—	52.4%—
CornishR. CornishAusarE. AusarCofieJ. CofieBaker-MazaraC. Baker-MazaraEaster IIJ. Easter II	32	18	-42.6—	97.6—	140.3—	62.5%—	10.0%—	25.2%—	50.0%—	60.9%—	61.1%—	10.4%—	62.5%—
RiceR. RiceDickersonA. DickersonCofieJ. CofieBaker-MazaraC. Baker-MazaraEaster IIJ. Easter II	30	15	-14.7—	86.1—	100.8—	35.7%—	14.3%—	16.6%—	61.9%—	44.4%—	58.8%—	19.5%—	37.0%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.