Big 10

Wisconsin

27-10NET#16Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #35Coach: Greg Gard

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,478	1,194	12.9—	118.0—	105.1—	53.9%—	29.5%—	14.2%—	34.3%—	48.3%—	70.8%—	14.8%—	28.0%—
WinterN. WinterCrowlS. CrowlBlackwellJ. BlackwellKlesmitM. KlesmitTonjeJ. Tonje	451	247	6.3—	111.7—	105.4—	53.6%—	28.4%—	16.2%—	26.6%—	50.9%—	76.4%—	14.4%—	18.4%—
CrowlS. CrowlBlackwellJ. BlackwellKlesmitM. KlesmitTonjeJ. TonjeGilmoreC. Gilmore	165	80	-0.7—	119.7—	120.5—	49.3%—	32.6%—	10.9%—	45.5%—	54.6%—	68.7%—	14.2%—	42.3%—
CrowlS. CrowlBlackwellJ. BlackwellTonjeJ. TonjeGilmoreC. GilmoreMcGeeK. McGee	143	69	36.3—	123.6—	87.3—	56.8%—	25.4%—	11.9%—	43.2%—	40.1%—	74.5%—	11.2%—	8.9%—
WinterN. WinterBlackwellJ. BlackwellKlesmitM. KlesmitTonjeJ. TonjeGilmoreC. Gilmore	117	53	47.8—	123.8—	75.9—	63.6%—	18.0%—	15.4%—	37.0%—	34.4%—	72.0%—	17.5%—	24.8%—
WinterN. WinterCrowlS. CrowlBlackwellJ. BlackwellTonjeJ. TonjeMcGeeK. McGee	81	45	16.6—	112.1—	95.5—	49.4%—	34.7%—	12.3%—	15.9%—	41.5%—	68.6%—	12.2%—	14.6%—
WinterN. WinterKlesmitM. KlesmitTonjeJ. TonjeGilmoreC. GilmoreMcGeeK. McGee	75	35	6.8—	100.5—	93.6—	47.0%—	31.0%—	20.1%—	21.2%—	50.0%—	80.0%—	17.8%—	15.5%—
WinterN. WinterBlackwellJ. BlackwellTonjeJ. TonjeGilmoreC. GilmoreMcGeeK. McGee	73	36	1.2—	99.5—	98.3—	34.9%—	38.6%—	9.5%—	34.2%—	46.5%—	72.1%—	15.7%—	12.5%—
CrowlS. CrowlBlackwellJ. BlackwellKlesmitM. KlesmitGilmoreC. GilmoreMcGeeK. McGee	63	30	30.1—	144.0—	113.9—	67.0%—	38.5%—	16.0%—	37.7%—	50.0%—	67.7%—	11.6%—	32.7%—
CrowlS. CrowlBlackwellJ. BlackwellKlesmitM. KlesmitTonjeJ. TonjeAmosX. Amos	55	24	17.1—	131.6—	114.5—	61.1%—	24.0%—	10.8%—	48.9%—	57.3%—	82.8%—	11.3%—	18.8%—
WinterN. WinterBlackwellJ. BlackwellKlesmitM. KlesmitGilmoreC. GilmoreMcGeeK. McGee	52	26	5.1—	99.4—	94.3—	43.4%—	17.1%—	3.8%—	13.2%—	45.2%—	75.0%—	18.9%—	45.2%—
CrowlS. CrowlKlesmitM. KlesmitTonjeJ. TonjeGilmoreC. GilmoreMcGeeK. McGee	51	24	6.1—	103.4—	97.3—	48.9%—	13.3%—	9.8%—	24.4%—	44.8%—	72.7%—	17.4%—	37.5%—
CrowlS. CrowlBlackwellJ. BlackwellTonjeJ. TonjeGilmoreC. GilmoreJanickiJ. Janicki	48	22	20.1—	136.3—	116.3—	62.5%—	31.6%—	14.5%—	66.7%—	61.4%—	82.4%—	16.3%—	54.3%—
CrowlS. CrowlBlackwellJ. BlackwellKlesmitM. KlesmitTonjeJ. TonjeMcGeeK. McGee	48	23	77.6—	175.3—	97.7—	78.8%—	35.3%—	6.3%—	57.5%—	42.7%—	72.4%—	16.3%—	68.3%—
WinterN. WinterBlackwellJ. BlackwellTonjeJ. TonjeGilmoreC. GilmoreJanickiJ. Janicki	48	21	48.5—	131.9—	83.4—	67.5%—	16.7%—	12.6%—	25.0%—	43.8%—	72.4%—	21.4%—	5.0%—
CrowlS. CrowlTonjeJ. TonjeGilmoreC. GilmoreJanickiJ. JanickiMcGeeK. McGee	46	23	27.6—	115.8—	88.3—	52.4%—	25.0%—	10.9%—	23.8%—	51.3%—	90.9%—	20.1%—	15.4%—
CrowlS. CrowlBlackwellJ. BlackwellGilmoreC. GilmoreJanickiJ. JanickiMcGeeK. McGee	45	20	15.7—	107.4—	91.6—	47.6%—	26.9%—	11.2%—	29.3%—	43.1%—	84.6%—	14.6%—	52.8%—
WinterN. WinterBlackwellJ. BlackwellKlesmitM. KlesmitTonjeJ. TonjeMcGeeK. McGee	42	19	-34.5—	100.6—	135.1—	50.0%—	20.0%—	16.8%—	29.4%—	62.1%—	55.6%—	18.9%—	65.5%—
CrowlS. CrowlKlesmitM. KlesmitTonjeJ. TonjeAmosX. AmosMcGeeK. McGee	41	17	-34.7—	90.9—	125.6—	48.1%—	25.0%—	29.5%—	44.4%—	52.5%—	63.6%—	10.0%—	20.0%—
WinterN. WinterTonjeJ. TonjeAmosX. AmosJanickiJ. JanickiMcGeeK. McGee	38	16	-4.0—	117.6—	121.6—	54.4%—	21.1%—	10.5%—	26.5%—	58.9%—	81.3%—	8.9%—	42.9%—
WinterN. WinterTonjeJ. TonjeGilmoreC. GilmoreJanickiJ. JanickiMcGeeK. McGee	38	18	34.5—	117.7—	83.2—	52.9%—	42.9%—	20.9%—	32.4%—	48.0%—	82.4%—	26.9%—	44.0%—
CrowlS. CrowlBlackwellJ. BlackwellTonjeJ. TonjeAmosX. AmosMcGeeK. McGee	37	20	30.3—	109.9—	79.6—	59.4%—	36.8%—	24.1%—	21.9%—	40.0%—	86.7%—	9.9%—	31.4%—
CrowlS. CrowlBlackwellJ. BlackwellAmosX. AmosJanickiJ. JanickiMcGeeK. McGee	36	16	13.2—	106.1—	92.9—	50.0%—	17.6%—	14.0%—	26.7%—	37.0%—	73.7%—	12.8%—	40.7%—
WinterN. WinterBlackwellJ. BlackwellKlesmitM. KlesmitTonjeJ. TonjeAmosX. Amos	36	17	-29.7—	89.5—	119.3—	35.9%—	17.4%—	8.4%—	31.3%—	50.0%—	55.0%—	14.5%—	13.9%—
CrowlS. CrowlTonjeJ. TonjeAmosX. AmosJanickiJ. JanickiMcGeeK. McGee	36	18	-6.6—	126.2—	132.7—	58.9%—	25.0%—	14.0%—	50.0%—	61.4%—	63.2%—	11.8%—	11.4%—
WinterN. WinterBlackwellJ. BlackwellKlesmitM. KlesmitAmosX. AmosMcGeeK. McGee	34	16	26.0—	132.9—	107.0—	70.0%—	30.8%—	14.8%—	20.0%—	54.0%—	84.6%—	16.2%—	24.0%—
CrowlS. CrowlBlackwellJ. BlackwellKlesmitM. KlesmitAmosX. AmosJanickiJ. Janicki	33	17	29.8—	116.0—	86.2—	46.8%—	36.8%—	12.2%—	32.3%—	43.1%—	57.9%—	27.6%—	0.0%—
BlackwellJ. BlackwellKlesmitM. KlesmitTonjeJ. TonjeGilmoreC. GilmoreMcGeeK. McGee	31	13	42.4—	143.3—	100.9—	54.8%—	38.5%—	12.7%—	114.3%—	41.3%—	75.0%—	14.4%—	43.5%—
WinterN. WinterBlackwellJ. BlackwellGilmoreC. GilmoreJanickiJ. JanickiMcGeeK. McGee	30	15	-34.9—	101.7—	136.6—	50.0%—	33.3%—	19.7%—	3.3%—	56.9%—	52.9%—	16.3%—	34.5%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.