MWC

San Diego St.

26-11NET#29Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #37Coach: Brian Dutcher

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,261	1,144	10.5—	112.3—	101.8—	50.0%—	36.8%—	16.8%—	35.4%—	47.5%—	68.3%—	18.7%—	33.0%—
ParrishM. ParrishButlerL. ButlerSaundersE. SaundersWatersR. WatersLeDeeJ. LeDee	366	191	28.7—	124.4—	95.7—	55.2%—	37.7%—	14.8%—	34.2%—	47.1%—	70.2%—	21.1%—	20.1%—
ParrishM. ParrishButlerL. ButlerLeDeeJ. LeDeePalJ. PalTrammellD. Trammell	259	150	8.2—	111.5—	103.3—	50.2%—	38.7%—	17.4%—	22.4%—	49.3%—	66.9%—	19.7%—	31.7%—
ParrishM. ParrishButlerL. ButlerSaundersE. SaundersLeDeeJ. LeDeeTrammellD. Trammell	146	72	10.5—	117.2—	106.6—	54.8%—	35.1%—	17.8%—	33.3%—	48.6%—	71.2%—	18.5%—	46.8%—
ParrishM. ParrishSaundersE. SaundersWatersR. WatersLeDeeJ. LeDeeTrammellD. Trammell	108	52	1.6—	101.6—	100.0—	46.3%—	27.1%—	14.8%—	31.9%—	46.0%—	70.2%—	16.4%—	21.2%—
ByrdM. ByrdWatersR. WatersLeDeeJ. LeDeePalJ. PalTrammellD. Trammell	81	36	19.9—	119.5—	99.6—	56.3%—	34.3%—	17.2%—	54.0%—	40.8%—	66.0%—	16.4%—	36.6%—
SaundersE. SaundersByrdM. ByrdWatersR. WatersLeDeeJ. LeDeeTrammellD. Trammell	79	42	10.7—	121.0—	110.3—	60.4%—	30.2%—	16.4%—	38.8%—	45.8%—	68.8%—	12.4%—	43.7%—
ParrishM. ParrishWatersR. WatersLeDeeJ. LeDeePalJ. PalTrammellD. Trammell	71	35	2.9—	115.2—	112.3—	56.5%—	38.2%—	19.7%—	63.0%—	50.8%—	72.5%—	12.0%—	46.0%—
ParrishM. ParrishButlerL. ButlerWatersR. WatersLeDeeJ. LeDeePalJ. Pal	69	31	50.5—	122.4—	71.9—	50.9%—	45.2%—	18.7%—	78.2%—	39.6%—	78.4%—	30.8%—	31.3%—
ButlerL. ButlerSaundersE. SaundersWatersR. WatersLeDeeJ. LeDeeTrammellD. Trammell	69	35	-19.9—	108.1—	128.0—	38.7%—	44.9%—	11.5%—	36.6%—	58.9%—	55.9%—	19.2%—	35.7%—
ButlerL. ButlerSaundersE. SaundersByrdM. ByrdWatersR. WatersLeDeeJ. LeDee	66	30	22.1—	109.9—	87.7—	58.0%—	24.1%—	19.6%—	44.0%—	39.8%—	69.2%—	18.1%—	25.4%—
ButlerL. ButlerWatersR. WatersLeDeeJ. LeDeePalJ. PalTrammellD. Trammell	66	33	9.7—	109.3—	99.6—	45.6%—	33.3%—	15.2%—	43.9%—	47.5%—	71.1%—	16.1%—	15.3%—
ParrishM. ParrishSaundersE. SaundersHeideM. HeideWatersR. WatersTrammellD. Trammell	47	24	22.0—	111.1—	89.1—	54.9%—	18.2%—	12.8%—	19.5%—	42.9%—	76.0%—	23.3%—	42.9%—
ButlerL. ButlerByrdM. ByrdWatersR. WatersLeDeeJ. LeDeePalJ. Pal	44	18	35.1—	113.1—	78.0—	43.8%—	37.5%—	6.8%—	22.9%—	39.4%—	70.8%—	22.6%—	30.3%—
ParrishM. ParrishButlerL. ButlerSaundersE. SaundersByrdM. ByrdLeDeeJ. LeDee	41	19	7.8—	111.9—	104.0—	44.6%—	38.5%—	17.0%—	40.5%—	50.0%—	54.5%—	24.2%—	18.4%—
ButlerL. ButlerByrdM. ByrdLeDeeJ. LeDeePalJ. PalTrammellD. Trammell	41	20	39.1—	127.6—	88.5—	66.7%—	26.7%—	17.2%—	30.3%—	48.5%—	70.8%—	28.7%—	24.2%—
ButlerL. ButlerSaundersE. SaundersByrdM. ByrdHeideM. HeideWatersR. Waters	35	17	-25.1—	84.8—	109.9—	36.5%—	44.0%—	19.8%—	13.5%—	48.3%—	63.2%—	15.3%—	33.3%—
ParrishM. ParrishButlerL. ButlerSaundersE. SaundersHeideM. HeideWatersR. Waters	34	18	0.7—	100.9—	100.2—	38.6%—	35.7%—	8.9%—	34.3%—	53.3%—	77.8%—	15.7%—	6.7%—
ByrdM. ByrdHeideM. HeideWatersR. WatersPalJ. PalTrammellD. Trammell	33	17	21.9—	119.7—	97.7—	51.3%—	41.7%—	12.0%—	7.9%—	46.6%—	75.0%—	14.8%—	34.5%—
ParrishM. ParrishButlerL. ButlerWatersR. WatersLeDeeJ. LeDeeTrammellD. Trammell	32	18	-41.1—	105.0—	146.1—	43.9%—	30.0%—	9.3%—	15.2%—	69.4%—	57.9%—	13.0%—	25.8%—
ParrishM. ParrishSaundersE. SaundersByrdM. ByrdLeDeeJ. LeDeeTrammellD. Trammell	30	15	3.2—	102.8—	99.6—	36.5%—	31.6%—	13.3%—	50.0%—	37.5%—	56.0%—	14.2%—	53.6%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2023-24. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.